Rivers are no respecters of national borders. The Danube is the second longest river in Europe and makes its way from Bavaria In Germany to the Black sea (Ukraine) passing through or forming the borders of ten countries. Four capital cities are on the Danube: Vienna (Austria), Bratislava (Slovakia), Budapest (Hungary) and Belgrade (Serbia).
This week’s journeyings took me to Budapest and Vienna for meetings with the Hungarian and Austrian Baptist Unions.
Hungarians are probably unique in Europe as they describe themselves as ‘the only nation surrounded by itself’. Having fought on the losing side of the First World War, the Treaty of Trianon in 1920 was imposed upon Hungary by the victorious Allies, reducing the ‘Greater Hungary’ to one third of its former size. This has left substantial Hungarian-speaking communities in Romania, Slovakia, Serbia and Ukraine. Although it all happened 90 years ago, you don’t have to talk to Hungarians for long without picking up the ongoing sense of injustice about the Treaty, and there are even proposals to grant Hungarian citizenship to the Hungarians living outside the borders. A glance at the EU website reveals that from time to time there are tensions arising between these Hungarian communities outside Hungary and their host communities.
It is interesting to see the Hungarian Baptist response to all this. The map in the Union office is of the pre-1920 ‘Greater Hungary’ and there is some sense in which the Hungarian Baptist Union feels an ongoing pastoral responsibility for the Hungarian-speaking churches outside its borders, though they are also all members of their national Baptist Unions. The Hungarian Baptist Union numbers around 10,000 members but there is also a World Hungarian Baptist Alliance which meets every few years and attracts around 6000 delegates from Europe and North America.
A lively conversation over dinner explored the question about what place nationalism has in Christian faith and discipleship, especially for Baptists whose belief in their formal separation from the state and the state church has been part of their DNA from the beginning. Hungarian Baptists seem to want to emphasise both their ultimate loyalty to Christ whilst at the same time embracing something of the nationalism which arises from Hungary’s tragic history and unique position in Europe today. Interesting, and it would be good to reflect further on this.
To cross the border to Austria to the most famous Danube city of Vienna is also to visit a nation which used to be at the centre of a large empire, but does not have the same ongoing issues about it as Hungary. Here the Baptist community is quite small but has grown significantly in recent years under the dynamic leadership of one of our most colourful characters in the EBF, Walter Klimt (and, yes, he is distantly related to the famous painter Gustav Klimt!).
With comparatively few resources the Union is doing some amazing work among young people and refugees and many of its churches in Vienna and elsewhere are ‘houses of prayer for many nations’, despite the (perhaps mistaken) impression sometimes given that the Austrian nation is cautious about foreigners. The Union itself has a significant number of ethnic churches, especially Romanian congregations, and is working well at integrating them.
Questions of nationalism, ethnicity, refugees etc are all about how secure we are in ourselves to be able to reach out the ‘other’ who is different from us. And for those of us who embrace the Christian faith it is sometimes a challenge to ensure that our unity in Christ is not undermined by nationalism. These are important issues in the whole of European Baptist life.
Meanwhile the Danube which flows in through so many nations and several capital cities could perhaps seen as a symbol of the life-giving Power that unites us…..


The post reminds me of the decision faced by a number of Hungarian colleagues who were invited to a Mission Conference in Paris. Travelling to Paris was tough for these friends with a keen sense of history and the role of France in the 1920 Treaty of Trianon that partitioned up the former Hungarian territories. Should they go or not? What would that mean for them? I'm glad that they chose to travel because their contribution undoubtedly made the conference programme richer.
ReplyDeleteSo, yes, further reflection is a necessity for those of us who are passionate about coming to terms with Europe's past so that we can better face the future - together.